http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_05.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_06.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_02.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_01.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_03.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_04.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_12.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_08.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_10.jpg
http://halseyrodman.com/files/gimgs/th-7_09.jpg
Kansas Gallery is pleased to present Triple Trouble, an exhibition of new work by Halsey Rodman on view from January 10 - February 14, 2014.

Triple Trouble presents a series of works concerned with minimal difference. The term minimal difference refers to the pulse of difference separating one moment from the next, the continuous transformation of objects in time, the modulation of color, and the wavering constitution of one’s self from moment to moment. Minimal difference is a way to think of the wavering edges of things considered as an events. This show asks: If every thing is in a constant state of becoming different from itself, can an entity ever be considered complete? And if no thing ever achieves a “true” state, what possibilities are suggested by this aggressive refusal to accept a natural state for things?

Central to this exhibition is Rodman’s fascination with the particularities of a specific object, the metronome, from within Henri Matisse’s 1916 painting, “The Piano Lesson”.

The metronome sits on a piano’s top, its back facing towards us. We see its hidden time regulating arm only through the eyes of clock-faced student sitting at the keyboard. Deep in the museum, the paint is quite dry, crystallized now for almost a century; the lights are always even and the temperature controlled. A bench across from the painting waits, ready to suspend the pendulous weight of one’s body in favor of the wandering eye.

At first glance, the metronome is still as a statue.

But looking further, over there on the canvas, the metronome will not sit still. This is because it has been painted twice: first, as a planar collection of gently modulating grey trapezoidal planes; and second, as a black wireframe — almost coinciding with the planar form but very specifically not quite. The bottom of this second linear metronome is kicked towards us, hinged out from the top to indicate a minutely steeper plane. Both forms exist simultaneously, the planes clearly visible through the wireframe. The paint is still, but the tick-tock of the metronome’s clock swings back and forth between these forms in the eye of their beholder — never at rest, these two simultaneous possibilities are always there to meet your gaze.

This motion between, the profoundly unresolved “and” of the this and this, is suggested by what is on the canvas, but these two states oscillate decidedly in the field of the beholder. Planar, Linear, Planar and Linear. This delicate shift, the metronome’s movement between states, always becoming other than itself, suggests a great unravelling: a shimmering entity, on the verge, always, of becoming something else.

Many of the works in “Triple Trouble” suggest a continuity as a “ground” to read this “figure” of minimal difference. A continuous shelf, beginning and ending at the front door, outlines the entire gallery, in a sense bringing the entirety of Kansas’s eccentric floor plan into the picture from any single vantage point. We can only see part of the shelf from any given place, but our awareness draws us beyond our position, always beyond our particular place — and, the shelf returns: how has it changed in its passage?

The shelf is punctuated by three near-identical lamps taking the form of Matisse’s metronome installed adjacent to the front window of the gallery. The light of the lamps is unwavering, an inverse clock to register the changing atmosphere filtered in from the outside.

Also central to this exhibition is a group of 47 gouache drawings, Cave System or Ear Canal, made over the past three years. Largely concerned with the difficulty (or impossibility) of assembling a coherent, continuous self from fragmentary experience, the drawings collect a strain of thought summarized by the question: Are you inside it or is it inside you?